Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDManualTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,226 km
    762 mi
  • Largest trunk
    550 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,460 kg
    3,219 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    132 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,460kg3,219lb
1,745kg3,847lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,415kg5,324lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
To 99% top speed
78.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
85.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
33.6s
Calculated
37.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton
Calculated
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
823km511mi
Calculated
1,226km762mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,663mm184in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,893mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,819mm111in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,616mm64in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,609mm63in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
550L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
65L
CO2 emissions
141g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.6 s
37.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.0 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,745 kg
3,847 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
223 km/h
139 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.4 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
823 km
511 mi
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,226 km
762 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
223 km/h
139 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
223 km/h
139 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.4 s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
223 km/h
139 mph
Lightness
1,460 kg
3,219 lb
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
823 km
511 mi
1,226 km
762 mi
CO2 score
141 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
132 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 404 km (251 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 2 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI clean diesel
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TDI clean diesel
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ22.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster