Car comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q5 II (FY)

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    107 hp/t
    80 kW/t
    9.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    136 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.7 L/100 km
    50.0 mpg US
    60.1 mpg UK
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
190hp142kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,775kg3,913lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,460kg5,423lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
85.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
97.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
41.5s
Calculated
63.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
1,132km703mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,663mm184in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,893mm75in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,659mm65in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,819mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,616mm64in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance-
213mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
650L
Max trunk volume
1,510L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
65L
60L
CO2 emissions
136g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0dPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI3,800-4,200 rpm1,750-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm
JaguarF-Pace2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
41.5 s
63.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,775 kg
3,913 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
218 km/h
135 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
208 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI7.9 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1,250 km
777 mi
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
1,132 km
703 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
218 km/h
135 mph
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.7 s
208 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace2.0d
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDIJaguarF-Pace2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
208 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
1,775 kg
3,913 lb
Fuel consumption
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,663 mm
183.6 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
1,132 km
703 mi
CO2 score
136 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.3 kg/hp
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.10 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.65 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used780 L206 US gal172 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,365 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 5 kg lighter
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI vs Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster