AUDI Q5 II (FY)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,770 kg3,902 lb
- Best power-to-weight107 hp/t80 kW/t9.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 85.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 97.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.5s Calculated | 63.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 1,132km703mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,663mm184in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,659mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 136g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.5 s | 63.6 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,132 km 703 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 1,132 km 703 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 136 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 5 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 118 km (73 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























