Volkswagen Tiguan II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSIvsJaguar F-Pace 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lightest1,775 kg3,913 lb
- Best power-to-weight101 hp/t76 kW/t9.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,132 km703 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed208 km/h129 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,787kg3,940lb | 1,775kg3,913lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,460kg5,423lb |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.3s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated | 97.6s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.3s Calculated | 63.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t120lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 811km504mi Calculated | 1,132km703mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,486mm177in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,673mm66in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,677mm105in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 615L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,655L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 3,940-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,940 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.3 s | 63.6 s |
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 811 km 504 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 1,132 km 703 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.7 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d |
| 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0d | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | JaguarF-Pace2.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 208 km/h 129 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,787 kg 3,940 lb | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km 44.4 mpg US 53.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 811 km 504 mi | 1,132 km 703 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 9.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 14.93 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 795 L210 US gal175 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,391 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0d
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 12 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 321 km (200 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























