AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
AUDI Q3 I (8U) · Facelift 2014 2.0 TDIvsAUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 II (FY)
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight113 hp/t84 kW/t8.8 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best performance score49/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,625kg3,583lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.3s Calculated | 41.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 107hp/t80kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,164km723mi Calculated | 1,250km777mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,388mm173in | 4,663mm184in |
| Width | 1,831mm72in | 1,893mm75in |
| Height | 1,608mm63in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,603mm102in | 2,819mm111in |
| Front track | 1,571mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,575mm62in | 1,609mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 460L | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,365L | 1,510L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 65L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.3 s | 41.6 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI has 6 hp more than AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
Although AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI has more power, AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 1,164 km 723 mi |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 1,250 km 777 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.9 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20142.0 TDI | AUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,164 km 723 mi | 1,250 km 777 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 107 hp/t 80 kW/t 9.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI | AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q3 I (8U) Facelift 2014 2.0 TDI
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
AUDI Q5 II (FY) 2.0 TDI
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (54 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























