AUDI Q5 I (8R)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSIvsSeat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Altea Freetrack
2.0 FSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Lightest1,571 kg3,463 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t95 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,571kg3,463lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,191kg4,830lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 81.6s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 78.4s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 42.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 127hp/t95kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 882km548mi Calculated | 638km397mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,629mm182in | 4,493mm177in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,653mm65in | 1,622mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,576mm101in |
| Front track | 1,617mm64in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,527mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 200mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,560L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,200 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 42.3 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI has 11 hp more than Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI and AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI and Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 882 km 548 mi |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 638 km 397 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 211 hp 157 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI |
| 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK |
| SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 I (8R)2.0 TFSI | SeatAltea Freetrack2.0 FSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,571 kg 3,463 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.5 L/100 km 27.7 mpg US 33.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 882 km 548 mi | 638 km 397 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 127 hp/t 95 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI | Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.88 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.94 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,275 L337 US gal280 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,231 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 I (8R) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 11 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 244 km (152 mi) more estimated range
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Seat Altea Freetrack 2.0 FSI
- Is 169 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























