AUDI Q5 III (GU)
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSIvsAUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q3 II (F3)
40 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,695 kg3,737 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,125 km699 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score92/100
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted226 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Gross weight | 2,460kg5,423lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Calculated | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 107.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 88.3s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 40.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 890km553mi Calculated | 1,125km699mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,717mm186in | 4,484mm177in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,856mm73in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,820mm111in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,645mm65in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,637mm64in | 1,576mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,473L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 4,300-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 40.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph Likely limited | 221 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has 14 hp more than AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 221 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 8.0 s |
Although AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI has more power, AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI and AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 890 km 553 mi |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 1,125 km 699 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 221 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | AUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 226 km/h140 mph | 221 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 890 km 553 mi | 1,125 km 699 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI | AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q3 II (F3) 40 TDI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 140 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 235 km (146 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























