Car comparison

AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI CODvsMazda CX-3 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

AUDI Q2

1.4 TFSI COD

150 hp1395 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2016-2018
VS

Mazda CX-3

2.0i

150 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedSUV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    208 km/h
    129 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    909 km
    565 mi
  • Largest trunk
    405 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best performance score
    43/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    79/100

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Lightest
    1,235 kg
    2,723 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    91 kW/t
    8.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODMazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
204Nm150lb-ft
Curb weight
1,280kg2,822lb
1,235kg2,723lb
Gross weight
1,840kg4,057lb
1,860kg4,101lb
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
To 99% top speed
78.0s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.7s
0-200 km/h
52.7s
Calculated
-
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
121hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
165Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
909km565mi
Calculated
688km427mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,395cc85cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,191mm165in
4,275mm168in
Width
1,794mm71in
1,765mm69in
Height
1,508mm59in
1,535mm60in
Wheelbase
2,601mm102in
2,570mm101in
Front track
1,547mm61in
1,523mm60in
Rear track
1,541mm61in
1,521mm60in
Ground clearance-
155mm6in
Trunk volume
405L
350L
Max trunk volume
1,050L
1,260L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
44L
CO2 emissions
125g/km
150g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI CODMazda CX-3 2.0iPowerTorque
  • AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-3 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm
MazdaCX-32.0i6,000 rpm2,800 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODMazdaCX-32.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
52.7 s
-
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
89 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
150 hp
112 kW
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MazdaCX-32.0i
204 Nm
150 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
MazdaCX-32.0i
1,235 kg
2,723 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
200 km/h
124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD8.5 s
MazdaCX-32.0i8.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD and Mazda CX-3 2.0i: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
909 km
565 mi
MazdaCX-32.0i
688 km
427 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
150 hp
112 kW
8.5 s
208 km/h
129 mph
MazdaCX-32.0i
150 hp
112 kW
8.7 s
200 km/h
124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.7 s
Top speed
200 km/h
124 mph
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.5 s
MazdaCX-32.0i
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
8.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-32.0i
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODMazdaCX-32.0i
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
204 Nm
150 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.7 s
Top speed
208 km/h
129 mph
200 km/h
124 mph
Lightness
1,280 kg
2,822 lb
1,235 kg
2,723 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.4 L/100 km
36.8 mpg US
44.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
405 L
14.3 cu ft
Length
4,191 mm
165.0 in
Height
1,508 mm
59.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Length
4,275 mm
168.3 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Range score
909 km
565 mi
688 km
427 mi
CO2 score
125 g/km
150 g/km
Trunk score
405 L
14.3 cu ft
350 L
12.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
121 hp/t
91 kW/t
8.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI CODMazda CX-3 2.0i
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km11.20 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi18.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal960 L254 US gal211 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,680 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD

  • Has 46 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 222 km (138 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 25 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Mazda CX-3 2.0i

  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD
Mazda CX-3 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.4 TFSI COD
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.4 TFSI COD
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ2Facelift 202035 TFSI
2.0i
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1.4 TFSI COD
35 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ2LFacelift 202135 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
1.4 TFSI COD
1.4 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)Facelift 20141.4 TFSI
2.0i
1.4 TFSI COD
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsAUDIQ21.4 TFSI COD
1.4 TFSI COD
2.0 TDI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
2.0i
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-32.0ivsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TDI
1.4 TFSI COD
2.0 TFSI
VS
AUDIQ21.4 TFSI CODvsAUDIQ3 I (8U)2.0 TFSI
AUDI Q2 1.4 TFSI COD vs Mazda CX-3 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster