Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II · Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4vsAUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI e-tron
50 71 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Largest trunk660 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
- Fastest top speed201 km/h125 mph
- Lightest2,083 kg4,592 lb
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,083kg4,592lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Gross weight | 3,000kg6,614lb | 3,040kg6,702lb |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 79.4s99% target: 199 km/h / 124 mph Calculated | 61.7s99% target: 198 km/h / 123 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 94.8s Calculated | - |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t128lb-ft/ton Calculated | 228Nm/t152lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,106km687mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,879mm192in | 4,901mm193in |
| Width | 2,073mm82in | 1,935mm76in |
| Height | 1,803mm71in | 1,632mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,923mm115in | 2,928mm115in |
| Front track | 1,693mm67in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,686mm66in | 1,652mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 278mm11in | 172mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 221L | 660L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,686L | 1,725L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 104L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 214g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 94.8 s | - |
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 149 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW |
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh has 13 hp more than Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4.
The biggest power difference is between Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 and AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 7.3 s |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh and Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | 300 hp 224 kW | 7.3 s | 201 km/h 125 mph |
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW | 6.8 s | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Land RoverRange Rover Sport IIFacelift 20172.0 Si4 | AUDIe-tron50 71 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 201 km/h 125 mph | Unrestricted 200 km/h124 mph Restricted 190 km/h118 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,083 kg 4,592 lb | 2,370 kg 5,225 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,106 km 687 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 214 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 221 L 7.8 cu ft | 660 L 23.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Land Rover Range Rover Sport II Facelift 2017 2.0 Si4
- Is 287 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
AUDI e-tron 50 71 kWh
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 439 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























