AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30VvsAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D)
2.8 V6 30V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score72/100
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V AWD
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range667 km414 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,400kg3,086lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.3s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 200Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,771cc169cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,479mm176in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,733mm68in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,607mm103in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,479mm58in | 1,477mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 440L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD: Power / Torque
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V AWD: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 193 hp 144 kW |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 193 hp 144 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 238 km/h 148 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V AWD and AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 660 km 410 mi |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30VFWD | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)2.8 V6 30VAWD | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 238 km/h 148 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,400 kg 3,086 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V AWD |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V FWD
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) 2.8 V6 30V AWD
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























