AUDI A6 (4B/C5)
Car comparison
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6vsAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
2.8 V6 30V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score78/100
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best economy score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 2,255kg4,971lb | 1,870kg4,123lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.2s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 67.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 25.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 574km357mi Calculated | 660km410mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,671cc163cu in | 2,771cc169cu in |
| Length | 4,796mm189in | 4,479mm176in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,733mm68in |
| Height | 1,453mm57in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,759mm109in | 2,617mm103in |
| Front track | 1,540mm61in | 1,498mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,479mm58in |
| Trunk volume | - | 440L |
| Max trunk volume | 434L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
| CO2 emissions | 293g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6: Power / Torque
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,500 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 25.6 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6 has 57 hp more than AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 574 km 357 mi |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 660 km 410 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 |
| 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK |
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA6 (4B/C5)2.7 T V6 | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.2 L/100 km 19.3 mpg US 23.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 574 km 357 mi | 660 km 410 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 293 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 434 L 15.3 cu ft | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6 | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.2 L/100 km19.3 mpg US23.2 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.35 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.36 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,830 L483 US gal403 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,203 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A6 (4B/C5) 2.7 T V6
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 86 km (53 mi) more estimated range
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























