AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999
Car comparison
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) · Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30VvsAUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI A6 (4A/C4)
2.8 V6 30V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range920 km571 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score78/100
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 193hp144kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | 1,870kg4,123lb | 2,000kg4,409lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.6s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 920km571mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,771cc169cu in | 2,771cc169cu in |
| Length | 4,479mm176in | 4,797mm189in |
| Width | 1,733mm68in | 1,783mm70in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,617mm103in | 2,687mm106in |
| Front track | 1,498mm59in | 1,524mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,479mm58in | 1,524mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
- AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 6,000 rpm | 3,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.6 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V and AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V and AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 660 km 410 mi |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 920 km 571 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA4 (B5/TYP 8D)Facelift 19992.8 V6 30V | AUDIA6 (4A/C4)2.8 V6 30V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 193 hp 144 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 920 km 571 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V | AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 15.22 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,284 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A4 (B5/TYP 8D) Facelift 1999 2.8 V6 30V
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI A6 (4A/C4) 2.8 V6 30V
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 260 km (162 mi) more estimated range
- Has 70 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























