AUDI A1 allstreet (GB)
Car comparison
AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSIvsDS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 3 Crossback
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best economy score93/100
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Most powerful155 hp116 kW
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.6s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.9s Calculated | 54.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 784km487mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,046mm159in | 4,118mm162in |
| Width | 1,756mm69in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,488mm59in | 1,534mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,566mm101in | 2,558mm101in |
| Front track | 1,523mm60in | - |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,090L | 1,050L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI: Power / Torque
- DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.9 s | 54.0 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW |
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech has 5 hp more than AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI and DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 8.1 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 8.2 s |
Although DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech has more power, AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI and DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 784 km 487 mi |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.1 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.2 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI |
| 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIA1 allstreet (GB)35 TFSI | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.1 L/100 km 46.1 mpg US 55.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 784 km 487 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI | DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.92 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.36 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 765 L202 US gal168 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,339 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI A1 allstreet (GB) 35 TFSI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























