Renault Espace V
Car comparison
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCevsDS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 3 Crossback
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
- Best economy score92/100
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Best estimated range935 km581 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score44/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,609kg3,547lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 2,410kg5,313lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 99.3s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 57.2s Calculated | 54.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 162Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 935km581mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,618cc99cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,857mm191in | 4,118mm162in |
| Width | 1,888mm74in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,677mm66in | 1,534mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,884mm114in | 2,558mm101in |
| Front track | 1,630mm64in | - |
| Rear track | 1,621mm64in | - |
| Ground clearance | 160mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 680L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,101L | 1,050L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 140g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: Power / Torque
- DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 5,750 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 57.2 s | 54.0 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 139 km/h 86 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW |
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe has 45 hp more than DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 8.6 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 8.2 s |
Although Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe has more power, DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 935 km 581 mi |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.6 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.2 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultEspace V1.6 TCe | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,609 kg 3,547 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 935 km 581 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 140 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe | DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Espace V 1.6 TCe
- Has 45 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 135 km (84 mi) more estimated range
- Has 330 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Is 404 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 14 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























