Volvo V40 Cross Country
Car comparison
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4vsDS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 3 Crossback
1.2 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions126 g/km
- Largest trunk350 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 155hp116kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,476kg3,254lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.0s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 81.1s99% target: 206 km/h / 128 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 48.6s Calculated | 54.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 163Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,199cc73cu in |
| Length | 4,370mm172in | 4,118mm162in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,791mm71in |
| Height | 1,470mm58in | 1,534mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,646mm104in | 2,558mm101in |
| Front track | 1,552mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 145mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 335L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,050L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 143g/km | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: Power / Torque
- DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 48.6 s | 54.0 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW |
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 has 25 hp more than DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 208 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 8.5 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 8.2 s |
Although Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 has more power, DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech and Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 155 hp 116 kW | 8.2 s | 208 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV40 Cross Country1.6 T4 | DS3 Crossback1.2 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 155 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 208 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,476 kg 3,254 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 143 g/km | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 335 L 11.8 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4 | DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 Cross Country 1.6 T4
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
DS 3 Crossback 1.2 PureTech
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 17 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























