Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsRolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Wraith
6.6 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
- Most powerful632 hp471 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.9 L/100 km23.8 mpg US28.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions327 g/km
- Best estimated range580 km361 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best economy score69/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Lightest1,739 kg3,834 lb
- Best power-to-weight329 hp/t246 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption21.4 L/100 km11.0 mpg US13.2 mpg UK
- Best performance score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 573hp427kW | 632hp471kW |
| Torque | 620Nm457lb-ft | 800Nm590lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,810kg6,195lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.1s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.1s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.9s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.4L/100 km16.3mpg US19.6mpg UK | 14.3L/100 km16.4mpg US19.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 21.4L/100 km11mpg US13.2mpg UK | 21.8L/100 km10.8mpg US13.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.9s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 329hp/t246kW/t149hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 357Nm/t239lb-ft/ton Calculated | 339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 542km337mi Calculated | 580km361mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 6,592cc402cu in |
| Length | 4,692mm185in | 5,285mm208in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,947mm77in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,507mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 3,112mm123in |
| Front track | - | 1,622mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,668mm66in |
| Trunk volume | - | 470L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 335g/km | 327g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 5,600 rpm | 1,500-5,500 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.9 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.1 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.1 s | 16.5 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.9 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.9 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 198 km/h 123 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 632 hp 471 kW |
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 has 59 hp more than Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: 59 hp (44 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 4.1 s |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 4.6 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 has more power, Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 and Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 542 km 337 mi |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 580 km 361 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 573 hp 427 kW | 4.1 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 632 hp 471 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 |
| 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | Rolls-RoyceWraith6.6 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 573 hp 427 kW | 632 hp 471 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.1 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.4 L/100 km 16.3 mpg US 19.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km 16.4 mpg US 19.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 542 km 337 mi | 580 km 361 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 335 g/km | 327 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 329 hp/t 246 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 | Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.4 L/100 km16.3 mpg US19.6 mpg UK | 14.3 L/100 km16.4 mpg US19.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.20 LC100 km | 25.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.56 LC100 mi | 40.27 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,160 L571 US gal475 UK gal | 2,145 L567 US gal472 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,780 LC/year | 3,754 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Is 621 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 62 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Rolls-Royce Wraith 6.6 V12
- Has 59 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























