Aston Martin Vanquish II
Car comparison
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12vsFerrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California T
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Lightest1,625 kg3,583 lb
- Best power-to-weight345 hp/t257 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions250 g/km
- Best estimated range743 km462 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Fastest top speed323 km/h201 mph
- Most powerful577 hp430 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577hp430kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 630Nm465lb-ft | 755Nm557lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,739kg3,834lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.6s99% target: 320 km/h / 199 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.7s Calculated | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.8L/100 km18.4mpg US22.1mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 332hp/t247kW/t151hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 362Nm/t242lb-ft/ton Calculated | 465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 609km379mi Calculated | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,935cc362cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,728mm186in | 4,570mm180in |
| Width | 1,912mm75in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,294mm51in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,740mm108in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 241L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | 298g/km | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 6,650 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 6,900 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 71.9 s | - |
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has 17 hp more than Ferrari California T 3.9 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 3.8 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 3.6 s |
Although Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 has more power, Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 609 km 379 mi |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 743 km 462 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 577 hp 430 kW | 3.8 s | 323 km/h 201 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 |
| 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12 | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp 430 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 630 Nm 465 lb-ft | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 323 km/h 201 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,739 kg 3,834 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.8 L/100 km 18.4 mpg US 22.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 609 km 379 mi | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 298 g/km | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 241 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 332 hp/t 247 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12 | Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.8 L/100 km18.4 mpg US22.1 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.40 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.05 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,920 L507 US gal422 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,360 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Vanquish II 6.0 V12
- Has 17 hp more
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Has 125 Nm more
- Is 114 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 133 km (83 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 48 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























