Aston Martin Rapide E
Car comparison
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWhvsSAIC Z7 100 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSAIC Z7
100 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful612 hp456 kW
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
- Lightest2,140 kg4,718 lb
- Best power-to-weight286 hp/t213 kW/t3.5 kg/hp
- Best economy score0/100
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 612hp456kW | 590hp440kW |
| Torque | 950Nm701lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,140kg4,718lb | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,740kg6,041lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 42.8s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.0s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 286hp/t213kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated | 257hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 444Nm/t297lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,019mm198in | 5,036mm198in |
| Width | 1,929mm76in | 1,976mm78in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,445mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,989mm118in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | - | 1,715mm68in |
| Rear track | - | 1,693mm67in |
| Trunk volume | - | 476L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,499L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.0 s | 14.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 187 km/h 116 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW |
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh has 22 hp more than SAIC Z7 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between SAIC Z7 100 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 239 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 4.2 s |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 3.4 s |
Although Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh has more power, SAIC Z7 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between SAIC Z7 100 kWh and Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | 612 hp 456 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW | 3.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SAICZ7100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Aston MartinRapide E65 kWh | SAICZ7100 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 612 hp 456 kW | 590 hp 440 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 239 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,140 kg 4,718 lb | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 286 hp/t 213 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Aston Martin Rapide E 65 kWh
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























