SAIC Z7
100 kWh
590 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2026-present
Car comparison
SAIC Z7 100 kWhvsMercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVS
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297)
AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
658 hpElectricAWDAutomaticLiftback / fastback2021-2024
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Lightest2,300 kg5,071 lb
- Best power-to-weight257 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score85/100
- Best economy score0/100
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Most powerful658 hp491 kW
- Highest torque950 Nm701 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SAICZ7100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 590hp440kW | 658hp491kW |
| Torque | 760Nm561lb-ft | 950Nm701lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,300kg5,071lb | 2,605kg5,743lb |
| Gross weight | 2,740kg6,041lb | 3,225kg7,110lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 42.8s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 47.1s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 257hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 365Nm/t244lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 5,036mm198in | 5,223mm206in |
| Width | 1,976mm78in | 1,926mm76in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 3,000mm118in | 3,210mm126in |
| Front track | 1,715mm68in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,693mm67in | 1,653mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 139mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 476L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,499L | 1,770L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SAICZ7100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 178 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 658 hp 491 kW |
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh has 68 hp more than SAIC Z7 100 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between SAIC Z7 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh: 68 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 3.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 3.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh has more power, SAIC Z7 100 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between SAIC Z7 100 kWh and Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh: 0.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh | 590 hp 440 kW | 3.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | 658 hp 491 kW | 3.8 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAICZ7100 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SAICZ7100 kWh | Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 590 hp 440 kW | 658 hp 491 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | 950 Nm 701 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,300 kg 5,071 lb | 2,605 kg 5,743 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 476 L 16.8 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 257 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
- Has 68 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
SAIC Z7 100 kWh
Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297) AMG EQS 53 120 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected
Popular comparisons
SAICZ7100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2026EQS 580 122 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)Facelift 2024AMG EQS 53 125 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsLotusEmeya102 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsAUDIRS7 Sportback (C8)4.0 TFSI V8
SAICZ7100 kWhvsAUDIE5 Sportback83 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2021Long Range 100 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsMercedes-BenzEQS (V297)EQS 580 120 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAston MartinRapide E65 kWh
SAICZ7100 kWhvsTeslaModel SFacelift 2016Performance 100 kWh
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)Facelift 20202.9 TFSI V6
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsFordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Mercedes-BenzEQS (V297)AMG EQS 53 120 kWhvsAston MartinRapide AMR6.0 V12