Nissan GT-R (R35)
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6vsAston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAston Martin DBS V12
5.9 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Fastest top speed320 km/h199 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Highest torque588 Nm434 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.3 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range597 km371 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12
- Most powerful517 hp386 kW
- Lightest1,695 kg3,737 lb
- Best power-to-weight305 hp/t227 kW/t3.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 485hp362kW | 517hp386kW |
| Torque | 588Nm434lb-ft | 570Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,740kg3,836lb | 1,695kg3,737lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated | 63.2s99% target: 304 km/h / 189 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.5s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 24.3L/100 km9.7mpg US11.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.2s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated | 305hp/t227kW/t138hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated | 336Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 597km371mi Calculated | 476km296mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 5,935cc362cu in |
| Length | 4,650mm183in | 4,721mm186in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,905mm75in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,280mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,740mm108in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 388g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 6,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.5 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.1 s | 12.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | 307 km/h 191 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.0 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.4 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 10.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.2 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 211 km/h 131 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW |
Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12 has 32 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 307 km/h 191 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 3.5 s |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 4.3 s |
Although Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12: 4.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 597 km 371 mi |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 476 km 296 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 517 hp 386 kW | 4.3 s | 307 km/h 191 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 |
| 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
| Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Aston MartinDBS V125.9 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 485 hp 362 kW | 517 hp 386 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | 570 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.5 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | 307 km/h 191 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | 1,695 kg 3,737 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 16.4 L/100 km 14.3 mpg US 17.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 597 km 371 mi | 476 km 296 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 388 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 305 hp/t 227 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 | Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK | 16.4 L/100 km14.3 mpg US17.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km | 28.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi | 46.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal | 2,460 L650 US gal541 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year | 4,305 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Has 18 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Aston Martin DBS V12 5.9 V12
- Has 32 hp more
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























