Car comparison

Artega Scalo 37 kWhvsBMW M4 (F82) 3.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Artega Scalo

37 kWh

408 hpElectricRWDAutomaticCoupe2015-present
VS

BMW M4 (F82)

3.0

431 hp2979 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2014-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Most powerful
    431 hp
    321 kW
  • Lightest
    1,537 kg
    3,389 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    445 L
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best economy score
    85/100
  • Best practicality score
    53/100

Artega Scalo 37 kWh

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Best performance score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelArtegaScalo37 kWhBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
408hp304kW
431hp321kW
Torque-
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,585kg3,494lb
1,537kg3,389lb
Gross weight-
2,040kg4,497lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
44.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
53.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
4.1s
0-200 km/h
11.9s
Calculated
14.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
3.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption-
8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.5s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
257hp/t192kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight-
358Nm/t239lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range-
723km449mi
Calculated
Displacement-
2,979cc182cu in
Length
4,010mm158in
4,671mm184in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,870mm74in
Height
1,200mm47in
1,383mm54in
Wheelbase
2,460mm97in
2,812mm111in
Front track-
1,579mm62in
Rear track-
1,603mm63in
Ground clearance-
121mm5in
Trunk volume
250L
445L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank-
60L
CO2 emissions-
194g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricArtegaScalo37 kWhBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
3.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
4.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.9 s
14.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.3 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
7.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.7 s
10.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.5 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
197 km/h
123 mph
188 km/h
117 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
408 hp
304 kW
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has 23 hp more than Artega Scalo 37 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Artega Scalo 37 kWh and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 23 hp (17 kW).

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
1,537 kg
3,389 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaScalo37 kWh3.6 s
BMWM4 (F82)3.04.1 s

Although BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 has more power, Artega Scalo 37 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Artega Scalo 37 kWh and BMW M4 (F82) 3.0: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
408 hp
304 kW
3.6 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
431 hp
321 kW
4.1 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
ArtegaScalo37 kWh
Power
408 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
BMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
431 hp
321 kW
0-100 km/h4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleArtegaScalo37 kWhBMWM4 (F82)3.0
Power
408 hp
304 kW
431 hp
321 kW
Torque
-
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
4.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
1,537 kg
3,389 lb
Fuel consumption
-
8.3 L/100 km
28.3 mpg US
34.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
250 L
8.8 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,200 mm
47.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Length
4,671 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,383 mm
54.4 in
Range score
-
723 km
449 mi
CO2 score
-
194 g/km
Trunk score
250 L
8.8 cu ft
445 L
15.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
257 hp/t
192 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.38 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,179 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Artega Scalo 37 kWh

  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M4 (F82) 3.0

  • Has 23 hp more
  • Is 48 kg lighter
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 195 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Artega Scalo 37 kWh
BMW M4 (F82) 3.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

37 kWh
E 500 V8
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsMercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C207)Facelift 2013E 500 V8
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 (G82)3.0
37 kWh
2.5 TFSI
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsAUDITT RS Coupe (8S)2.5 TFSI
3.0
3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (F83)3.0
37 kWh
3.5 V6
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsLotusEvora 4003.5 V6
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
37 kWh
S 500 V8
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsMercedes-BenzS-class Coupe (C217)S 500 V8
3.0
Competition 3.0
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMWM2 coupe (F87)Competition 3.0
37 kWh
Carrera 4S 3.8
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsPorsche911 (991)Carrera 4S 3.8
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Coupe (F13)650i
37 kWh
4.2 FSI V8
VS
ArtegaScalo37 kWhvsAUDIRS5 Coupe (8T)Facelift 20124.2 FSI V8
3.0
650i
VS
BMWM4 (F82)3.0vsBMW6 Series Gran Coupe (F06)650i
Artega Scalo 37 kWh vs BMW M4 (F82) 3.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster