Alpine A110
Car comparison
Alpine A110 S 1.8vsMercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238)
E 350d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful292 hp218 kW
- Lightest1,114 kg2,456 lb
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score69/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range926 km575 mi
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpineA110S 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292hp218kW | 286hp213kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,114kg2,456lb | 1,790kg3,946lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,365kg5,214lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 85.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.4s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 160hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 287Nm/t192lb-ft/ton Calculated | 335Nm/t224lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 738km458mi Calculated | 926km575mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,800cc110cu in | 2,925cc178cu in |
| Length | 4,180mm165in | 4,826mm190in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,248mm49in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,419mm95in | 2,873mm113in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,609mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 98mm4in |
| Trunk volume | - | 425L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6,400 rpm | 2,000-6,400 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | - | 1,200-3,200 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpineA110S 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 292 hp 218 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 286 hp 213 kW |
Alpine A110 S 1.8 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d and Alpine A110 S 1.8: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 1,114 kg 2,456 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d and Alpine A110 S 1.8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 738 km 458 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 926 km 575 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 292 hp 218 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 286 hp 213 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpineA110S 1.8 | Mercedes-BenzE-class Coupe (C238)E 350d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp 218 kW | 286 hp 213 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.4 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,114 kg 2,456 lb | 1,790 kg 3,946 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 738 km 458 mi | 926 km 575 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 160 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpine A110 S 1.8 | Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Has 6 hp more
- Is 676 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 102 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz E-class Coupe (C238) E 350d
- Has 280 Nm more
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 188 km (117 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























