Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0vsAlpine A110 S 1.8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpine A110
S 1.8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,140 kg2,513 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Best economy score88/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,140kg2,513lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,360kg2,998lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 77.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.1s | 12.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 12.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 4,530mm178in | 4,181mm165in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,293mm51in | 1,252mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,420mm95in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6,300 rpm | 2,400-6,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.1 s | 12.8 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 12.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 194 km/h 121 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has 85 hp more than Alpine A110 S 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 85 hp (63 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 4.2 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has more power, Alpine A110 S 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | AlpineA110S 1.8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 | Alpine A110 S 1.8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.85 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,678 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 85 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























