Alpine A110
Car comparison
Alpine A110 S 1.8vsAUDI TTS Coupe (8S) · Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI TTS Coupe (8S) · Facelift 2018
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted275 km/h171 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,140 kg2,513 lb
- Best power-to-weight263 hp/t196 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score88/100
AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best estimated range655 km407 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score50/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpineA110S 1.8 | AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 340Nm251lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,140kg2,513lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,360kg2,998lb | 1,815kg4,001lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.8s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 263hp/t196kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 225hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 298Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 282Nm/t188lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 643km399mi Calculated | 655km407mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,181mm165in | 4,199mm165in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,362mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,505mm99in |
| Front track | - | 1,568mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,547mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 305L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 712L |
| Doors | 2 | 3 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpine A110 S 1.8: Power / Torque
- AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 6,300 rpm | 2,400-6,000 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 5,600-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpineA110S 1.8 | AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 194 km/h 121 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 320 hp 239 kW |
AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI has 20 hp more than Alpine A110 S 1.8.
The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 4.2 s |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 4.5 s |
Although AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI has more power, Alpine A110 S 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 S 1.8 and AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 643 km 399 mi |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 655 km 407 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 320 hp 239 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 S 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA110S 1.8 | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
| AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpineA110S 1.8 | AUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 275 km/h171 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,140 kg 2,513 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 643 km 399 mi | 655 km 407 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 263 hp/t 196 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 225 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpine A110 S 1.8 | AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.25 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,838 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpine A110 S 1.8
- Is 280 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
AUDI TTS Coupe (8S) Facelift 2018 2.0 TFSI
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 12 km (7 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























