Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0vsPorsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (992)
Carrera T 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed293 km/h182 mph
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.5 L/100 km17.4 mpg US20.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range674 km419 mi
- Largest trunk145 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score41/100
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Best power-to-weight262 hp/t195 kW/t3.8 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 370hp276kW | 385hp287kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.3s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.7s Calculated | 15.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.4s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 316Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated | 306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 674km419mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,530mm178in |
| Width | 1,808mm71in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,285mm51in | 1,293mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Ground clearance | - | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 132L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 215g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.7 s | 15.1 s |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.4 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has 15 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
Although Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 has more power, Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 674 km 419 mi |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.5 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.5 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche911 (992)Carrera T 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 370 hp 276 kW | 385 hp 287 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 674 km 419 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 215 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Is 45 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 46 km (29 mi) more estimated range
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera T 3.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























