Porsche 911 (992)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0vsPorsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonPorsche 911 (991 II)
Carrera T 3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed293 km/h182 mph
- Most powerful385 hp287 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions206 g/km
- Best estimated range711 km442 mi
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Best power-to-weight260 hp/t194 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk145 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 385hp287kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,505kg3,318lb | 1,425kg3,142lb |
| Gross weight | 1,960kg4,321lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.1s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated | 63.3s99% target: 290 km/h / 180 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 13.5L/100 km17.4mpg US20.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 260hp/t194kW/t118hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 316Nm/t211lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 711km442mi Calculated | 674km419mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,981cc182cu in | 2,981cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,808mm71in |
| Height | 1,298mm51in | 1,285mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,591mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,557mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | 132L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 206g/km | 215g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0: Power / Torque
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,950-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 6,500 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 13.7 s |
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 195 km/h 121 mph | 191 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW |
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 has 15 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 and Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 293 km/h 182 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 4.2 s |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 711 km 442 mi |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 674 km 419 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 385 hp 287 kW | 4.2 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 370 hp 276 kW | 4.5 s | 293 km/h 182 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 |
| 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK |
| Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (992)Carrera 3.0 | Porsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 385 hp 287 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 293 km/h 182 mph | 293 km/h 182 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.0 L/100 km 26.1 mpg US 31.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 711 km 442 mi | 674 km 419 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 206 g/km | 215 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 132 L 4.7 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 260 hp/t 194 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0 | Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.75 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.35 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,350 L357 US gal297 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,363 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (992) Carrera 3.0
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 km (23 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Porsche 911 (991 II) Carrera T 3.0
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 13 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























