Car comparison

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0vsAlpine A110 1.8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Porsche 718 Cayman (982)

T 2.0

300 hp1988 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2018-2020
VS

Alpine A110

1.8

252 hp1800 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTurbochargedCoupe2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpine A110 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.5 s
  • Lightest
    1,103 kg
    2,432 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    228 hp/t
    170 kW/t
    4.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    138 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    738 km
    458 mi
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    285 km/h
    177 mph Unrestricted
    275 km/h
    171 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    71/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelPorsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0AlpineA1101.8
Power
300hp224kW
252hp188kW
Torque
380Nm280lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,380kg3,042lb
1,103kg2,432lb
Gross weight
1,685kg3,715lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
65.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph
Calculated
53.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
14.8s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
217hp/t162kW/t99hp/1000 lb
Calculated
228hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton
Calculated
290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
684km425mi
Calculated
738km458mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,988cc121cu in
1,800cc110cu in
Length
4,379mm172in
4,180mm165in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,798mm71in
Height
1,276mm50in
1,252mm49in
Wheelbase
2,475mm97in
2,420mm95in
Front track
1,528mm60in
1,556mm61in
Rear track
1,534mm60in
1,553mm61in
Trunk volume
150L
-
Max trunk volume
275L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
54L
45L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
138g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0Alpine A110 1.8PowerTorque
  • Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Alpine A110 1.8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.07,500 rpm2,150-4,500 rpm7,750 rpm
AlpineA1101.86,000 rpm2,000 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricPorsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0AlpineA1101.8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.8 s
15.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
12.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
186 km/h
115 mph
184 km/h
114 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
AlpineA1101.8
252 hp
188 kW

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 has 48 hp more than Alpine A110 1.8.

The biggest power difference is between Alpine A110 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: 48 hp (36 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
AlpineA1101.8
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
AlpineA1101.8
1,103 kg
2,432 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
AlpineA1101.8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.04.7 s
AlpineA1101.84.5 s

Although Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 has more power, Alpine A110 1.8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
AlpineA1101.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpine A110 1.8 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
AlpineA1101.8
228 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
684 km
425 mi
AlpineA1101.8
738 km
458 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
300 hp
224 kW
4.7 s
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
AlpineA1101.8
252 hp
188 kW
4.5 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,276 mm
50.2 in
AlpineA1101.8
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
AlpineA1101.8
Power
252 hp
188 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
4.7 s
AlpineA1101.8
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
AlpineA1101.8
228 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehiclePorsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0AlpineA1101.8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
252 hp
188 kW
Torque
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
285 km/h177 mph
Restricted
275 km/h171 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,380 kg
3,042 lb
1,103 kg
2,432 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
150 L
5.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,276 mm
50.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,180 mm
164.6 in
Height
1,252 mm
49.3 in
Range score
684 km
425 mi
738 km
458 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
138 g/km
Trunk score
150 L
5.3 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
217 hp/t
162 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
228 hp/t
170 kW/t
4.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehiclePorsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0Alpine A110 1.8
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km10.67 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi17.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal915 L242 US gal201 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,601 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0

  • Has 48 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Alpine A110 1.8

  • Is 277 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 42 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0
Alpine A110 1.8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

T 2.0
T 2.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsPorsche718 Boxster (982)T 2.0
1.8
430i
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsBMW4 Series Gran Coupe (F36)Facelift 2017430i
T 2.0
4.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsPorsche718 Spyder (982)4.0
1.8
430i
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsBMW4 Series Coupe (F32)Facelift 2017430i
T 2.0
S 3.4
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsPorscheCayman (981C)S 3.4
1.8
45 TFSI
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)45 TFSI
T 2.0
3.0 V6
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsPorscheCayenne IIIFacelift 20233.0 V6
1.8
45 TFSI
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsAUDIA5 Coupe (F5)Facelift 201945 TFSI
T 2.0
Carrera T 3.0
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsPorsche911 (991 II)Carrera T 3.0
1.8
45 TFSI
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsAUDITT Coupe (8S)Facelift 201845 TFSI
T 2.0
2.0 TFSI
VS
Porsche718 Cayman (982)T 2.0vsAUDITTS Coupe (8S)Facelift 20182.0 TFSI
1.8
SLC 300
VS
AlpineA1101.8vsMercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) T 2.0 vs Alpine A110 1.8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster