Alpine A110
Car comparison
Alpine A110 1.8vsMercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016 SLC 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLC (R172) · Facelift 2016
SLC 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpine A110 1.8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Lightest1,103 kg2,432 lb
- Best power-to-weight228 hp/t170 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Best estimated range968 km601 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpineA1101.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,103kg2,432lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.3s Calculated | 21.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 228hp/t170kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 738km458mi Calculated | 968km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,800cc110cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,180mm165in | 4,133mm163in |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,252mm49in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,420mm95in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,553mm61in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 138g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpine A110 1.8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpineA1101.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.3 s | 21.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Alpine A110 1.8 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300 and Alpine A110 1.8: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 1,103 kg 2,432 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpine A110 1.8 and Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 738 km 458 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 968 km 601 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 252 hp 188 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpine A110 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpineA1101.8 | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpineA1101.8 | Mercedes-BenzSLC (R172)Facelift 2016SLC 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,103 kg 2,432 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 738 km 458 mi | 968 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 138 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 228 hp/t 170 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpine A110 1.8 | Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpine A110 1.8
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 327 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 57 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Mercedes-Benz SLC (R172) Facelift 2016 SLC 300
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























