Alpina XD3 (F25)
Car comparison
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0vsJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
3.0t V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed253 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score89/100
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,500kg5,512lb |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.0s Calculated | 21.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,015km631mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,647mm183in | 4,731mm186in |
| Width | 1,901mm75in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 209g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.0 s | 21.8 s |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 4.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 1,015 km 631 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,015 km 631 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 209 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 307 km (191 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Is 90 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























