Car comparison

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0vsJaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alpina XD3 (F25)

3.0

350 hp2993 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2013-2014
VS

Jaguar F-Pace

3.0t V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedSUV2016-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    253 km/h
    157 mph
  • Most powerful
    350 hp
    261 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.6 L/100 km
    35.6 mpg US
    42.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,015 km
    631 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Lightest
    1,820 kg
    4,012 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    187 hp/t
    139 kW/t
    5.4 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
350hp261kW
340hp254kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,910kg4,211lb
1,820kg4,012lb
Gross weight
2,440kg5,379lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
253 km/h
157 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
61.8s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph
Calculated
73.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
18.0s
Calculated
21.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.1s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb
Calculated
187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton
Calculated
247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,015km631mi
Calculated
708km440mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
2,995cc183cu in
Length
4,647mm183in
4,731mm186in
Width
1,901mm75in
2,070mm81in
Height
1,670mm66in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,810mm111in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,614mm64in
1,641mm65in
Rear track
1,609mm63in
1,654mm65in
Ground clearance-
213mm8in
Trunk volume
550L
650L
Max trunk volume
1,600L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
67L
63L
CO2 emissions-
209g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6PowerTorque
  • Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.04,000 rpm1,500-3,000 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V66,500 rpm4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.0 s
21.8 s
Top speed
253 km/h
157 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.0 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.1 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
350 hp
261 kW
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
1,820 kg
4,012 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
253 km/h
157 mph
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
250 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.04.9 s
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V65.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 2.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
1,015 km
631 mi
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
708 km
440 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
350 hp
261 kW
4.9 s
253 km/h
157 mph
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.8 s
250 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
253 km/h
157 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,647 mm
183.0 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
Power
350 hp
261 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
253 km/h
157 mph
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
250 km/h
155 mph
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
4.9 s
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6
Power
350 hp
261 kW
340 hp
254 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.8 s
Top speed
253 km/h
157 mph
250 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,910 kg
4,211 lb
1,820 kg
4,012 lb
Fuel consumption
6.6 L/100 km
35.6 mpg US
42.8 mpg UK
8.9 L/100 km
26.4 mpg US
31.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
550 L
19.4 cu ft
Length
4,647 mm
183.0 in
Height
1,670 mm
65.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,731 mm
186.3 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
1,015 km
631 mi
708 km
440 mi
CO2 score
-
209 g/km
Trunk score
550 L
19.4 cu ft
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
183 hp/t
137 kW/t
5.5 kg/hp
187 hp/t
139 kW/t
5.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlpina XD3 (F25) 3.0Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.55 LC100 km15.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.59 LC100 mi25.07 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used990 L262 US gal218 UK gal1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,733 LC/year2,336 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 250 Nm more
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 307 km (191 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6

  • Is 90 kg lighter
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 100 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 vs Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster