Alpina XD3 (F25)
Car comparison
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0vsAUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI RSQ3 · Facelift 2015
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0
- Fastest top speed253 km/h157 mph
- Most powerful350 hp261 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,015 km631 mi
- Largest trunk550 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score86/100
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Lightest1,580 kg3,483 lb
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 350hp261kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,910kg4,211lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 2,440kg5,379lb | 2,215kg4,883lb |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.8s99% target: 250 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.0s Calculated | 16.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 183hp/t137kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 366Nm/t245lb-ft/ton Calculated | 285Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,015km631mi Calculated | 762km473mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,647mm183in | 4,411mm174in |
| Width | 1,901mm75in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,598mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,810mm111in | 2,603mm102in |
| Front track | 1,614mm64in | 1,571mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,577mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 550L | 356L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,600L | 1,261L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 67L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: Power / Torque
- AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 5,300-6,700 rpm | 1,600-5,300 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.0 s | 16.8 s |
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 350 hp 261 kW |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW |
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 has 10 hp more than AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI and Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 4.9 s |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 4.8 s |
Although Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 has more power, AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI and Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 and AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 1,015 km 631 mi |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 762 km 473 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 350 hp 261 kW | 4.9 s | 253 km/h 157 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 340 hp 254 kW | 4.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaXD3 (F25)3.0 | AUDIRSQ3Facelift 20152.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 350 hp 261 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 253 km/h 157 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,910 kg 4,211 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,015 km 631 mi | 762 km 473 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 183 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0 | AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina XD3 (F25) 3.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
- Has 194 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
AUDI RSQ3 Facelift 2015 2.5 TFSI
- Is 330 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























