Jaguar F-Pace
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6vsMercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLS (X166)
GLS 400
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.8 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Lightest1,820 kg4,012 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions209 g/km
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score83/100
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Largest trunk680 L
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 333hp248kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 2,360kg5,203lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.4s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 93.3s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.5s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.9s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 708km440mi Calculated | 1,064km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,731mm186in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | - | 1,934mm76in |
| Height | 1,652mm65in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,641mm65in | 1,655mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,654mm65in | 1,675mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | 209g/km | 218g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 5,250-6,000 rpm | 1,600-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.5 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.9 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 167 km/h 104 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 333 hp 248 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400 and Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 5.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 and Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 708 km 440 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 1,064 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.8 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 333 hp 248 kW | 6.6 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-Pace3.0t V6 | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 400 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 333 hp 248 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 240 km/h 149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,820 kg 4,012 lb | 2,360 kg 5,203 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 708 km 440 mi | 1,064 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 209 g/km | 218 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6 | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace 3.0t V6
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 540 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X166) GLS 400
- Has 30 Nm more
- Has 356 km (221 mi) more estimated range
- Has 30 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























