Alpina Roadster S
Car comparison
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24VvsBMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Convertible (E46)
3.2i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.0 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score67/100
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Most powerful343 hp256 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score44/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 343hp256kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Gross weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 76.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s Calculated | 20.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 521km324mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,346cc204cu in | 3,246cc198cu in |
| Length | 4,090mm161in | 4,492mm177in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,780mm70in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,363mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,731mm108in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,508mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 240L | 300L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 6,300 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 7,900 rpm | 4,900 rpm | 8,150 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.8 s | 20.0 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW |
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has 43 hp more than Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 5.3 s |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 5.5 s |
Although BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V has more power, Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V and BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.3 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | 343 hp 256 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | BMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 343 hp 256 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,655 kg 3,649 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 521 km 324 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V
- Is 335 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BMW M3 Convertible (E46) 3.2i 24V
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 3 Nm more
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























