Alpina Roadster S
Car comparison
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24VvsChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonChevrolet Camaro IV · Facelift 1998
Z28 5.7 i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk240 L
- Best performance score67/100
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque472 Nm348 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 310hp231kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 472Nm348lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,930kg4,255lb |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s Calculated | 21.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated | 294Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 538km334mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,346cc204cu in | 5,665cc346cu in |
| Length | 4,090mm161in | 4,914mm193in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,300mm51in | 1,315mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,500mm98in | 2,568mm101in |
| Front track | 1,470mm58in | 1,542mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,540mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 240L | 215L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | 930L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 278g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V: Power / Torque
- Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 6,300 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5,200 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.8 s | 21.2 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW |
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has 10 hp more than Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 5.3 s |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 5.5 s |
Although Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 has more power, Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V and Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.3 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | 310 hp 231 kW | 5.5 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaRoadster S3.3 i 24V | ChevroletCamaro IVFacelift 1998Z28 5.7 i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 310 hp 231 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 472 Nm 348 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 538 km 334 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 278 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina Roadster S 3.3 i 24V
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 34 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Chevrolet Camaro IV Facelift 1998 Z28 5.7 i V8
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 110 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























