Alpina B7 (G12)
Car comparison
Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8vsBMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M5 (F90)
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8
- Fastest top speed325 km/h202 mph Unrestricted310 km/h193 mph Restricted
- Most powerful608 hp453 kW
- Highest torque800 Nm590 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best economy score79/100
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Lightest1,855 kg4,090 lb
- Best power-to-weight323 hp/t241 kW/t3.1 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions241 g/km
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 608hp453kW | 600hp447kW |
| Torque | 800Nm590lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,035kg4,486lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 2,735kg6,030lb | 2,440kg5,379lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 41.9s99% target: 322 km/h / 200 mph Calculated | 40.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.3s Calculated | 11.1s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.1s Calculated | 11.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 299hp/t223kW/t136hp/1000 lb Calculated | 323hp/t241kW/t147hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton Calculated | 404Nm/t271lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 648km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 5,250mm207in | 4,966mm196in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,491mm59in | 1,473mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 3,210mm126in | 2,982mm117in |
| Front track | 1,622mm64in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 132mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 515L | 530L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 78L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 242g/km | 241g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 5,750-6,250 rpm | 3,000-5,000 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 5,600-6,700 rpm | 1,800-5,600 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.3 s | 11.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 42.2 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 4.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.5 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.1 s | 11.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 223 km/h 139 mph | 201 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 608 hp 453 kW |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW |
Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8 has 8 hp more than BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 2,035 kg 4,486 lb |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 3.7 s |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 3.4 s |
Although Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 and Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 750 km 466 mi |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 648 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 608 hp 453 kW | 3.7 s | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 600 hp 447 kW | 3.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB7 (G12)4.4 V8 | BMWM5 (F90)4.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 608 hp 453 kW | 600 hp 447 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 800 Nm 590 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 325 km/h202 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,035 kg 4,486 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 648 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 242 g/km | 241 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 515 L 18.2 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 299 hp/t 223 kW/t 3.3 kg/hp | 323 hp/t 241 kW/t 3.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8 | BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B7 (G12) 4.4 V8
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Has 60 km/h (37 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 102 km (64 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW M5 (F90) 4.4 V8
- Is 180 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























