Alpina B5 (E60)
Car comparison
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 SvsBentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBentley Continental Flying Spur
6.0 i W12 48V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Lightest1,795 kg3,957 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption18.6 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 725Nm535lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 2,475kg5,456lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,980kg6,570lb |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 50.0s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 309 km/h / 192 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 26.4L/100 km8.9mpg US10.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 404Nm/t270lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,841mm191in | 5,307mm209in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,937mm76in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,479mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 3,065mm121in |
| Front track | 1,566mm62in | 1,623mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,607mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
- Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 5,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 6,100 rpm | 1,650 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 14.2 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 191 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW |
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V has 30 hp more than Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 312 km/h 194 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 4.6 s |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 5.2 s |
Although Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V has more power, Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S and Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.6 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | 560 hp 418 kW | 5.2 s | 312 km/h 194 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | BentleyContinental Flying Spur6.0 i W12 48V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | 312 km/h 194 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 2,475 kg 5,456 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S
- Has 75 Nm more
- Is 680 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Bentley Continental Flying Spur 6.0 i W12 48V
- Has 30 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























