Alpina B5 (E60)
Car comparison
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 SvsJaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351)
5.0 V8 Supercharged
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed317 km/h197 mph
- Most powerful530 hp395 kW
- Highest torque725 Nm535 lb-ft
- Lightest1,795 kg3,957 lb
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.3 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range678 km421 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 725Nm535lb-ft | 625Nm461lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,892kg4,171lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | 2,365kg5,214lb |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 50.0s99% target: 314 km/h / 195 mph Calculated | 47.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.6L/100 km12.6mpg US15.2mpg UK | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 270hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 404Nm/t270lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 678km421mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,398cc268cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,841mm191in | 5,122mm202in |
| Width | 1,846mm73in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,888mm114in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,566mm62in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 82L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 5,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 189 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 510 hp 380 kW |
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S has 20 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged and Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 1,892 kg 4,171 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S and Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 569 km 354 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 678 km 421 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.6 s | 317 km/h 197 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB5 (E60)4.4 V8 S | JaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8 Supercharged | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 725 Nm 535 lb-ft | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 317 km/h 197 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,795 kg 3,957 lb | 1,892 kg 4,171 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 678 km 421 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 270 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S | Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B5 (E60) 4.4 V8 S
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 52 km/h (32 mph) higher top speed
- Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ (X351) 5.0 V8 Supercharged
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 109 km (67 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























