Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26)
Car comparison
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0vsMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192)
55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.7 s
- Fastest top speed301 km/h187 mph
- Most powerful495 hp369 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight252 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range602 km374 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Lightest1,895 kg4,178 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 495hp369kW | 476hp355kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,965kg4,332lb | 1,895kg4,178lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.7s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated | 61.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.5s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 11.6s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 252hp/t188kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated | 369Nm/t247lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 602km374mi Calculated | 496km308mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 3,982cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,792mm189in | 4,728mm186in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,440mm57in | 1,354mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,856mm112in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,593mm63in | 1,683mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,686mm66in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 321L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,290L | 675L |
| Doors | 4 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 223g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 5,000-7,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.5 s | 12.3 s |
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.6 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 200 km/h 125 mph | 196 km/h 122 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 495 hp 369 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW |
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 has 19 hp more than Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0: 19 hp (14 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 1,965 kg 4,332 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 3.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 and Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8: 4.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 602 km 374 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 496 km 308 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 495 hp 369 kW | 3.7 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 476 hp 355 kW | 3.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 |
| 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | Mercedes-BenzAMG GT (C192)55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 495 hp 369 kW | 476 hp 355 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 301 km/h 187 mph | 295 km/h 183 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,965 kg 4,332 lb | 1,895 kg 4,178 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km 16.7 mpg US 20.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 602 km 374 mi | 496 km 308 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 223 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 321 L 11.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 | Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 24.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 39.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 2,115 L559 US gal465 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 3,701 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0
- Has 19 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
- Has 149 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz AMG GT (C192) 55 V8
- Is 70 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























