Porsche 718 Cayman (982)
Car comparison
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0vsAlpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26)
3.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0
- Most powerful495 hp369 kW
- Highest torque730 Nm538 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range602 km374 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best economy score81/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.4 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Lightest1,464 kg3,228 lb
- Best power-to-weight337 hp/t251 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 493hp368kW | 495hp369kW |
| Torque | 449Nm331lb-ft | 730Nm538lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,464kg3,228lb | 1,965kg4,332lb |
| Gross weight | 1,771kg3,904lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 48.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 59.7s99% target: 298 km/h / 185 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.4s | 3.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.6s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.3s Calculated | 3.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 14L/100 km16.8mpg US20.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.0s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 337hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated | 252hp/t188kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 307Nm/t205lb-ft/ton Calculated | 372Nm/t249lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | 602km374mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,993cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,455mm175in | 4,792mm189in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,850mm73in |
| Height | 1,267mm50in | 1,440mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,484mm98in | 2,856mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,593mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,588mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 102mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 470L |
| Max trunk volume | 136L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 2 | 4 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 59L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 223g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0: Power / Torque
- Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 8,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm | 9,000 rpm |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 5,000-7,000 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.3 s | 3.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.4 s | 3.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.6 s | 11.5 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 301 km/h 187 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.3 s | 7.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.3 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.0 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 134 mph | 200 km/h 125 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 493 hp 368 kW |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 495 hp 369 kW |
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 has 2 hp more than Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 1,464 kg 3,228 lb |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 1,965 kg 4,332 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 301 km/h 187 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 3.4 s |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 3.7 s |
Although Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 has more power, Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 and Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 and Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0: 2.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 520 km 323 mi |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 602 km 374 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 493 hp 368 kW | 3.4 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 495 hp 369 kW | 3.7 s | 301 km/h 187 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 3.4 s |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche718 Cayman (982)GT4 RS 4.0 | AlpinaB4 Gran Coupe (G26)3.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 493 hp 368 kW | 495 hp 369 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 449 Nm 331 lb-ft | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.4 s | 3.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | 301 km/h 187 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,464 kg 3,228 lb | 1,965 kg 4,332 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | 602 km 374 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 223 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 136 L 4.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 337 hp/t 251 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 252 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0 | Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 718 Cayman (982) GT4 RS 4.0
- Is 501 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B4 Gran Coupe (G26) 3.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 281 Nm more
- Uses 2.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
- Has 334 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























