Alpina B3 (E90)
Car comparison
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i BiturbovsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution X
2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph
- Most powerful360 hp268 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.1 L/100 km16.7 mpg US20.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score81/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.1 s
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight230 hp/t172 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 359hp268kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 363Nm268lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | 2,090kg4,608lb | 2,040kg4,497lb |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.1s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 38.6s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.6s Calculated | 12.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 3.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.1L/100 km16.7mpg US20.0mpg UK | 21.9L/100 km10.7mpg US12.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 11.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 219hp/t163kW/t99hp/1000 lb Calculated | 230hp/t172kW/t104hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 643km399mi Calculated | 387km241mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,979cc182cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,545mm179in | 4,505mm177in |
| Width | 1,817mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,422mm56in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,760mm109in | 2,650mm104in |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | 1,545mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,513mm60in | 1,545mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 328g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 3,800-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 3.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.6 s | 12.0 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 7.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 11.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 193 km/h 120 mph | 200 km/h 124 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 360 hp 268 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW |
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo has 1 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 4.8 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 4.1 s |
Although Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 and Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo and Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360: 4.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 643 km 399 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 387 km 241 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.8 s | 285 km/h 177 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 359 hp 268 kW | 4.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
| 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | 4.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB3 (E90)3.0i Biturbo | MitsubishiLancer Evolution X2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 359 hp 268 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 285 km/h 177 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km 16.6 mpg US 19.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 643 km 399 mi | 387 km 241 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 328 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 219 hp/t 163 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 230 hp/t 172 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 24.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 39.99 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 2,130 L563 US gal469 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 3,728 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B3 (E90) 3.0i Biturbo
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 137 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution X 2.0 MIVEC FQ-360
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























