Alpina B3 (E46)
Car comparison
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3SvsMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph
- Most powerful305 hp227 kW
- Lowest highway consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range543 km337 mi
- Largest trunk440 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Highest torque383 Nm282 lb-ft
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight212 hp/t158 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.4 L/100 km15.3 mpg US18.3 mpg UK
- Best economy score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305hp227kW | 280hp209kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 383Nm282lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | - |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 54.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.7s Calculated | 17.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK | 15.4L/100 km15.3mpg US18.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 210hp/t157kW/t95hp/1000 lb Calculated | 212hp/t158kW/t96hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 543km337mi Calculated | 505km314mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,346cc204cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,471mm176in | 4,490mm177in |
| Width | 1,739mm68in | 1,770mm70in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,625mm103in |
| Front track | 1,471mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,481mm58in | 1,515mm60in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 440L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S: Power / Torque
- Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 6,300 rpm | 4,800 rpm | 6,550 rpm |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.7 s | 17.6 s |
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 305 hp 227 kW |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW |
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S has 25 hp more than Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 6.3 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 5.9 s |
Although Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S has more power, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 and Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 543 km 337 mi |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 505 km 314 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 305 hp 227 kW | 6.3 s | 265 km/h 165 mph |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 280 hp 209 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AlpinaB3 (E46)3.3 i 24V B3S | MitsubishiLancer Evolution VIII2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp 227 kW | 280 hp 209 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 383 Nm 282 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 265 km/h 165 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 543 km 337 mi | 505 km 314 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 440 L 15.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 210 hp/t 157 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 212 hp/t 158 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S | Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 19.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 2,861 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alpina B3 (E46) 3.3 i 24V B3S
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 km (24 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII 2.0
- Has 21 Nm more
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























