Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 BiturbovsAlpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B3 (E36)
3.2 i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Most powerful287 hp214 kW
- Highest torque362 Nm267 lb-ft
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk435 L
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 287hp214kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 362Nm267lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,545kg3,406lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,945kg4,288lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 59.0s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 56.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.3s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 3,152cc192cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,650mm104in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,410mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,500mm59in | 1,423mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 420L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 6,500 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 5,800 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.3 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW |
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo has 22 hp more than Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo and Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 769 km 478 mi |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 Biturbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 287 hp 214 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 362 Nm 267 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,545 kg 3,406 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo | Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 Biturbo
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 32 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 23 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























