Volvo S70
Car comparison
Volvo S70 2.3 TurbovsAlpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlpina B3 (E36)
3.2 i 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t149 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score60/100
- Best economy score82/100
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 265hp198kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 330Nm243lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,473kg3,247lb | 1,330kg2,932lb |
| Gross weight | 1,920kg4,233lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 56.3s99% target: 245 km/h / 152 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 199hp/t149kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,319cc142cu in | 3,152cc192cu in |
| Length | 4,720mm186in | 4,433mm175in |
| Width | 1,760mm69in | 1,698mm67in |
| Height | 1,390mm55in | 1,373mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,660mm105in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,410mm56in |
| Rear track | 1,470mm58in | 1,423mm56in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 435L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6,000 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 5,800 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 247 km/h 153 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 170 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW |
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V has 15 hp more than Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo and Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 247 km/h 153 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 6.7 s |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V and Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo: 0.3 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | 265 hp 198 kW | 6.4 s | 247 km/h 153 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS702.3 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS702.3 Turbo | AlpinaB3 (E36)3.2 i 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 265 hp 198 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 247 km/h 153 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,473 kg 3,247 lb | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 199 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S70 2.3 Turbo
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Alpina B3 (E36) 3.2 i 24V
- Has 15 hp more
- Is 143 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























