Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4vsBYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Tonale

2.0 T4

272 hp1995 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2023-2025
VS

BYD Sealion 7

82.5 kWh

313 hpElectricRWDAutomaticSUV2024-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph Unrestricted
    225 km/h
    140 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    170 hp/t
    127 kW/t
    5.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
Power
272hp203kW
313hp233kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
2,225kg4,905lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
2,635kg5,809lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
69.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
74.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
25.8s
Calculated
31.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
520km323mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
-
Length
4,527mm178in
4,830mm190in
Width
1,841mm72in
1,925mm76in
Height
1,657mm65in
1,620mm64in
Wheelbase
2,635mm104in
2,930mm115in
Front track
1,574mm62in
1,660mm65in
Rear track
1,573mm62in
1,660mm65in
Ground clearance
212mm8in
157mm6in
Trunk volume
500L
520L
Max trunk volume
1,550L
1,789L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.8 s
31.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.6 s
9.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
313 hp
233 kW

BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh has 41 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4.

The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
2,225 kg
4,905 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T46.5 s
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh6.7 s

Although BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
272 hp
203 kW
6.5 s
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
313 hp
233 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
Power
313 hp
233 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,830 mm
190.2 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4BYDSealion 782.5 kWh
Power
272 hp
203 kW
313 hp
233 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
235 km/h146 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
215 km/h134 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
2,225 kg
4,905 lb
Fuel consumption
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
500 L
17.7 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,657 mm
65.2 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,830 mm
190.2 in
Height
1,620 mm
63.8 in
Range score
520 km
323 mi
-
Trunk score
500 L
17.7 cu ft
520 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
170 hp/t
127 kW/t
5.9 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
Consumption9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 625 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh

  • Has 41 hp more
  • Has 20 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 vs BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster