Alfa Romeo Tonale
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4vsBYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBYD Sealion 7
82.5 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.5 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score81/100
BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh
- Most powerful313 hp233 kW
- Largest trunk520 L
- Best practicality score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | BYDSealion 782.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 313hp233kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 2,225kg4,905lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,635kg5,809lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 215 km/h134 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.8s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 31.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,830mm190in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,925mm76in |
| Height | 1,657mm65in | 1,620mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,635mm104in | 2,930mm115in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | 1,660mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | 157mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 520L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,789L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | BYDSealion 782.5 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 31.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 215 km/h134 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW |
BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh has 41 hp more than Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 215 km/h134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 6.5 s |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 6.7 s |
Although BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh has more power, Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 and BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | 313 hp 233 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 215 km/h134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BYDSealion 782.5 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | BYDSealion 782.5 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 313 hp 233 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 215 km/h134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 2,225 kg 4,905 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 141 hp/t 105 kW/t 7.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 625 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
BYD Sealion 7 82.5 kWh
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 20 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























