Alfa Romeo Tonale
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4vsAUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI Q5 III (GU)
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range691 km430 mi
- Largest trunk782 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,600 kg3,527 lb
- Best power-to-weight170 hp/t127 kW/t5.9 kg/hp
- Best performance score59/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 268hp200kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,600kg3,527lb | 1,925kg4,244lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 69.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.5s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.8s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 520km323mi Calculated | 691km430mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,717mm186in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,900mm75in |
| Height | 1,657mm65in | 1,669mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,635mm104in | 2,817mm111in |
| Front track | 1,574mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,573mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 212mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 782L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,550L | 1,611L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 65L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.5 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.8 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW |
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has 4 hp more than AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 6.2 s |
Although Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 has more power, AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI and Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 520 km 323 mi |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 691 km 430 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 272 hp 203 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 268 hp 200 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
| AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoTonale2.0 T4 | AUDIQ5 III (GU)2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 268 hp 200 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.5 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,600 kg 3,527 lb | 1,925 kg 4,244 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 520 km 323 mi | 691 km 430 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 782 L 27.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4 | AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 17.15 LC100 km | 16.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,573 LC/year | 2,468 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Tonale 2.0 T4
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI Q5 III (GU) 2.0 TFSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 171 km (106 mi) more estimated range
- Has 282 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























