Lamborghini Urus
Car comparison
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Fastest top speed305 km/h190 mph
- Most powerful650 hp485 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight295 hp/t220 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range669 km416 mi
- Best overall score89/100
- Best performance score89/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Lightest1,830 kg4,034 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions227 g/km
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 650hp485kW | 510hp380kW |
| Torque | 850Nm627lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 1,830kg4,034lb |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.8s99% target: 302 km/h / 188 mph Calculated | 44.9s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.6s | 3.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 12.8s | 11.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.4s Calculated | 3.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 11.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 295hp/t220kW/t134hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 386Nm/t259lb-ft/ton Calculated | 328Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 669km416mi Calculated | 653km406mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 2,891cc176cu in |
| Length | 5,112mm201in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 2,016mm79in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,638mm64in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 3,003mm118in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,695mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,710mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 248mm10in | - |
| Trunk volume | 616L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,596L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 64L |
| CO2 emissions | 290g/km | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 2,250-4,500 rpm | 6,800 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.4 s | 3.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.6 s | 3.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 12.8 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 11.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW |
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 has 140 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: 140 hp (104 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 3.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 3.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 and Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8: 2.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 669 km 416 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 653 km 406 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 650 hp 485 kW | 3.6 s | 305 km/h 190 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 510 hp 380 kW | 3.8 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
| 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 3.6 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | 3.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | LamborghiniUrus4.0 V8 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 650 hp 485 kW | 510 hp 380 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.6 s | 3.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 305 km/h 190 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,200 kg 4,850 lb | 1,830 kg 4,034 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km 24.0 mpg US 28.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 669 km 416 mi | 653 km 406 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 290 g/km | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 616 L 21.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 295 hp/t 220 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 17.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 27.60 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year | 2,573 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Lamborghini Urus 4.0 V8
- Has 140 hp more
- Has 250 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 22 km/h (14 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 16 km (10 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.9T Bi-Turbo V6
- Is 370 kg lighter
- Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 63 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























