Volvo XC60 II
Car comparison
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5vsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 235hp175kW | 210hp157kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 470Nm347lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,950kg4,299lb | 1,745kg3,847lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 70.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.7s Calculated | 36.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,203km748mi Calculated | 951km591mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,688mm185in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,902mm75in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,668mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,673mm66in | - |
| Ground clearance | 216mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,432L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 71L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 160g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,280 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.7 s | 36.9 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has 25 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.6 s |
Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 951 km 591 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 235 hp 175 kW | 210 hp 157 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,203 km 748 mi | 951 km 591 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 160 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Has 25 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 253 km (157 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























