Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Lightest1,745 kg3,847 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range951 km591 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,951kg4,301lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 53.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 951km591mi Calculated | 896km556mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,747mm187in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 2,071mm82in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,664mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | - | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | - | 1,656mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 755L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,804L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 53.5 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has 6 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.6 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 951 km 591 mi |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 896 km 556 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,951 kg 4,301 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 951 km 591 mi | 896 km 556 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 206 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 2.0d
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























