Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
Car comparison
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque470 Nm347 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range951 km591 mi
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,605 kg3,538 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,745kg3,847lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.8s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 73.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.9s Calculated | 40.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.2s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 120hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 269Nm/t180lb-ft/ton Calculated | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 951km591mi Calculated | 845km525mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,903mm75in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,693mm67in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,818mm111in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | - | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 160g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 4,200 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.9 s | 40.3 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 951 km 591 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 845 km 525 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 hp 157 kW | 6.6 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,745 kg 3,847 lb | 1,605 kg 3,538 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 951 km 591 mi | 845 km 525 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 160 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 120 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TSI
- Is 140 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























