Skoda Kodiaq I
Car comparison
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDIvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight114 hp/t85 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,789kg3,944lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.9s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.6s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,882mm74in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,680mm66in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,791mm110in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,586mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,576mm62in | - |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 270L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 2,005L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.6 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI has 10 hp more than Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM.
The biggest power difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
Although Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI has more power, Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TDI | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,789 kg 3,944 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 112 hp/t 83 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 129 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























