Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTechvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,055 km655 mi
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,429 kg3,150 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 181hp135kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,429kg3,150lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | - |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 84.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.0s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 175Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 679km422mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,447mm175in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,675mm105in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 219mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 520L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,482L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 53L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.0 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM has 9 hp more than Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 8.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 679 km 422 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 181 hp 135 kW | 8.0 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Peugeot3008 II (PHASE II)1.6 PureTech | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 181 hp 135 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,429 kg 3,150 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 679 km 422 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Peugeot 3008 II (PHASE II) 1.6 PureTech
- Is 231 kg lighter
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 375 km (233 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























