BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20dvsAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949)
2.2 JTDM
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,085 km674 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score94/100
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20d | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | 2,125kg4,685lb | - |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 78.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.0s Calculated | 48.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,085km674mi Calculated | 1,055km655mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 2,143cc131cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,693mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,818mm111in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | - |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | - |
| Trunk volume | 470L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 145g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20d: Power / Torque
- Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 3,500 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20d | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.0 s | 48.2 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 7.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and BMW X2 (F39) 20d: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20d and Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 1,085 km 674 mi |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 1,055 km 655 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20d | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20d | Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,085 km 674 mi | 1,055 km 655 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 145 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20d | Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20d
- Is 120 kg lighter
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 31 km (19 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























